当前位置:学识网 > 英语知识 > 英语写作 > 英语作文 > 英语作文

2020年8月29日雅思大作文预测及范文

2020-10-29信息举报

在雅思考试前,考生可以重点总结一下今年的考题有什么特点,考试趋势是什么,可以指导我们有效的进行备考。今天小编给大家整理了2020年8月29日雅思大作文预测及范文,我们一起来看看吧!

2020年8月29日雅思大作文预测及范文

2020年8月29日雅思大作文预测及范文1

观点类大作文,旅游类话题

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目大意

当今,国际旅游是世界上最大产业。不幸的是,国际旅游给来自不同文化的人们带来了关系的紧张而不是相互的理解。你在多大程度上同意还是不同意?

写作思路解析

??题干两句话。但是第一句话为陈述句无逻辑考点,第二句为讨论话题,两句间无明确因果逻辑关系,单观点议论文出题方式,考察比较关系。

?? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 在多大程度上同意或不同意出题方式。

?? 话题类型:旅游+国际化。话题词 international tourism, tension, understanding, different cultures

高分写作示范

Recent decades have witnessed the flourish in global traveling and it has become a lifestyle for the normal people. Some contend that this trend has caused tension between diverse cultures rather than enhancement of understanding, but I find such opinion flawed and hard to justify.

Admittedly, international tourism seems to bring some misunderstanding between local populace and foreign travelers. For example, many people believe that the tourism have aggravated or spoiled the visited locations due to pollution and littering. However, it seems to me that these bad behaviors are not caused by international tourism, but by the lack of personal moral principles, and even some of the locals have these flaws too. Meanwhile, with close supervision and rigid regulations, these issues can be strategically addressed.

Therefore, I personally believe that the international tourism should be promoted because of its enormous benefits, especially in the aspect related to the enhancement of understanding of diverse cultures. First of all, this kind of tourism can certainly make travelers access and feel the first-hand experience,by which I mean experiencing cultural differences in person can substantially stimulate people's curiosity and desire for exploration. Therefore, it is not rare that travelers fall in love with the culture of the host country and work as cultural ambassadors later. Besides, international tourism eases tension between people of various nationalities through enhancing multicultural communication. In other words, although reading the second hand information presented on the social media or other publications may partially ease the misunderstanding caused by the ignorance and prejudice, we find it confusing to interpret or complying with diverging cultural norms without experiencing civilizations on a first hand basis. Luckily, traveling gives people a feasible solution by the means of accessing the different land.

In conclusion, international tourism connects people in various countries rather than separating them. Far from causing tension, international tourism improves people's relationship from different cultures.

相关词汇和语法结构

Populace 百姓/平民

Proficiency 熟练

Rare 稀有

Host countries 所在国

Ambassador 大使

Enhancement 提升

Interpret 解释

Diverging 偏离

Address 解决加强

Flaws 瑕疵

Firsthand 一手,亲自

nuisances 麻烦事儿

2020年8月29日雅思大作文预测及范文2

观点类大作文,政府类话题

Some people think it is more important for the government to spend more money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illnesses than the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目大意

一些人认为,政府花更多的钱提倡健康的生活方式,以预防疾病,比治疗已经生病的人更重要。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

思路解析

不同意

当然,有一些人认为,政府支出应该更好地通过促进健康的生活方式来预防疾病的发生,而不是用来治疗那些已经生病的人。对他们来说,目前没有健康问题但正在等待更好生活条件的人数总是多于后者。这意味着宏观经济配置首先要满足大多数纳税主体的需要,以确保投资的说服力。如果这些资金流用于有机食品生产、住宅环境中的健身设施,甚至更好的空气条件,那么这些资金流就被认为是有用的。它们更接近公众的日常健康,而且在某种程度上很容易被证明可以避免某些与食物相关的、久坐不动和污染导向的疾病。而投资在医疗行业的支出似乎比较“隐形”,因为总是只有少数人有身体问题,也很难判断这笔钱最终是否有价值。治疗也存在失败;要验证治愈的患者是因为医疗设施的资金投入还是仅仅因为他们的免疫力而痊愈,这听起来很模糊。

然而,上面提出的想法并没有让人想到医疗领域的投资可能具有的真正重要性,并使他们无法认识到潜在的危险和不合理的一面。无论如何提倡健康生活,我们都必须承认,在某些情况下,我们目前所知的“健康”生活方式并不能有效地“防病”。那么,在卫生史上,一些自相矛盾的健康规则,考虑到某些生活习惯可能是有意义的,或者是有害的,最终被证明是不能接受的,这也就不足为奇了。这还不是全部的事实,直到我们也意识到,对于某些疾病来说,仅仅健康的生活方式肯定是不够的。如果没有系统的医疗专业知识、设施或资源来应对疾病,人们更容易患上疾病。在这种情况下,投资于健康生活推广是非常没有意义的。提示语中的短视思维,使我们不能理性地思考“重要性”的真正含义;因此,这两个投资方向的重要性是不可比拟的,因为我们对目前的医疗保健和对未知的未来的了解仍然有限。

高分写作示范

To access whether the government should invest money in the prevention of illness or the related treatment, I might have to consider how to define certain utterances made by this topic. From the perspective of the government, it is reasonable for them to spend money in the area that is beneficial to the overwhelming people; however, the take-home message is how the government is to define “importance”.

There are, of course, people out there holding that government spending should be better given out to prevent diseases from haening via promoting a healthy lifestyle rather than to treat those who have already been ill. To them, the number of people currently without health problems but awaiting a better living condition is always more than that of the latter. That means the macro-economic allocation should firstly fulfill the need of most of the tax contributors to make sure the investment is persuasive. The financial flows are considered useful if they are used to things like organic food produce, fitness facilities set in residential surroundings, or even better air condition. They are much closer to the daily health of the public and would be somewhat easily proved to avoid certain food-related, sedentariness-driven, and pollution-oriented illnesses. Whereas the expenditure invested in the medical industry seems comparatively “invisible”, as it is always enjoyed solely by the minority who are put into the physical problems, and would be also hard to judge whether this money would be finally valuable. There also exist failures in the treatment; it sounds obscured to verify whether the cured patients get well because of the financial input in the medical facilities or just because of their immunity.

However, the thinking presented above doesn’t allow one to think of real importance that the investment in the medical area may have, and precludes them from recognizing the potential hazards and irrationality that lie. No matter how a healthy life is to promote, one must admit that in some cases, the lifestyle that is deemed “healthy” by our current knowledge cannot effectively “prevent illness”. Then it is not surprising that in the hygiene history, some paradoxical health rules considering certain living habits would be meaningful or harmful, have finally been proved unacceptable. We should also realize that for certain illnesses, the solely healthy lifestyle is certainly not enough. People are prone to diseases easily if there were no systematic medical expertise, facilities, or resources in dealing with them. In that case, investing in a healthy life promotion is spectacularly meaningless. The myopic thinking given in the prompt distracts us from rationally thinking what the “importance” truly means; it is then incomparable between the two investment directions in terms of the importance because of our still limited knowledge to our current health care and to the unknown future.

In conclusion, I would agree that the policy of government investing in a healthy lifestyle cannot be considered more significant than in disease treatment.

相关词汇和语法结构

Utterance 表达

Allocation 分配

Irrationality 不合理性

  • 返回顶部